Alleged mediums lapse so much. But they're still deified

People currently are saying, with strange emphasis, that the "brazilian mediums" always "do mistakes".

"They're imperfect. They fail constantly. They're the ones that lapse too much", they say.

What interest they have to insist about this point of view?

Allan Kardec described, in The Book of Mediums, several risks that define the imperfect mediums, including mystification and spiritual obsession.

Several excerpts mention it, specially the 195 and 196 items from the 16th chapter, Special Mediums, from the Part II, From Spititists Manifestations.

It means that Francisco Candido Xavier, aka Chico Xavier, the most known alleged brazilian medium, must to be defined as "frivilous medium". As Kardec written:

Frivolous mediums - The ones that don't get serious their faculty and serve them only to fun and insane finalities.

It's so painful to Chico Xavier's followers and supporters.

They deceptively believe that Chico Xavier had other definition about his work, as a "good medium": the "modest medium", mentioned by the 197 item from The Book of Mediums. As Kardec written:

Modest mediums - The ones that attribute them no merit from the received communications, however they were so better. The mediums consider those communications as being from others and they don't judge free from mystifications. Far from get ridding of the imparcial advices, they request them.

Unfortunately, Chico Xavier showed, in his all trajectory, strange aspects about this work.

Their alleged psychographies brought a lot of mistakes. It was not simple mistakes, that would deserve apologies and go ahead.

They're serious and worrisome mistakes that hurt the personal aspects from each alleged dead author let to us in life.

One example is the alleged psychography about the famous writer and founder member of Brazilian Academy of Letters, Olavo Bilac, as an ironic comment by literary specialist Joao Dornas Filho:

"Olavo Bilac, um homem que no estágio de imperfeição nunca assinou um verso imperfeito, depois de morto ditou a Chico Xavier sonetos inteirinhos abaixo dos medíocres".

"Olavo Bilac, a man that in his imperfection stage never written an imperfect verse, after death dictated to Chico Xavier entire sonnets less than mediocre".

Every opportunist guy can say that his work can be to "the bread of the poor".

And Chico Xavier's mistakes were very worrisome and serious enough to eliminate even the simplest admiration to him.

He didn't do charities. He always defended the "accept of sufferance in silence", asking the suffers to don't cry in their extreme pain. This is charity? No.

And the philanthropic Chico's projects were so mediocre like the brazilian presenters like Luciano Huck usually did and do.

Chico Xavier perverted the original Kardec's lesson inserting the medieval Catholicism's dogmas. Any confirmation? Read Chico Xavier's books and anyone will confirm it.

What's the point to admit that Chico Xavier and similares are "imperfect" and "frequently fail" if the followers and supporters continue to admire him as a demigod, although they say that admire him "only for his positive qualities"?

The human falsehood had so hidden tricks that made people, in some cases, deceive themselves.

Nobody wants to be recognized as bad and failed. And there's one more confusion about Chico Xavier.

This new confusion is that he is admitted as "faulty" but he's also treated like a demigod.

What's the point to removing and idol from his pedestal if there's always an altar reserved to him?

"Imperfect mediums" don't help Brazilian Spiritism to adjust and heal

CHICO XAVIER, AT THE MIDDLE, AND DIVALDO FRANCO, WITH BLACK SUIT - ALLEGED MEDIUMS THAT "FAIL SO MUCH".

It turned to be a hit tendence to claim that the brazilian alleged mediums are "faulty" and "fail so much".

The Brazilian Spiritism and the non-vinculated supporters now claims against the previous deification of alleged mediums like Francisco Candido Xavier (aka Chico Xavier) and Divaldo Franco.

"No, they aren't demigods! Mediums are only humble and good people with risk to fail!", say someone.

"They're not the saviours of the humankind. Neither stand up, nor mounted on a horseback", say other.

"They're not really perfect. They're good and kind, but they're imperfect and passable to fail", say another person.

And it goes ahead.

And why there's an apparent chorus to claim that "brazilian mediums can fail and are no perfect"?

The Joao de Deus affair helped so much to increase this clamor.

He was a pretense cure medium from Abadiania, Goias, born Joao Teixeira de Faria.

He's also an ambitious farmer and accused to harass and rape women and to have illegal weapon possession, beyond the other crimes.

Until the criminal case, the Brazilian Spiritism movement rarely talked about the alleged mediums imperfection.

The spiritist preachers and also the kardecian real followers as Jose Herculano Pires - nephew of the folklore brazilian storyteller Cornelio Pires and best Kardec's translator in Brazil - said that "mediums must to get off the pedestal".

But the followers, until Joao de Deus affair, believed that mediums only have their own decisions when they do something right, but if they do something wrong it was under the obsessor spirits influence.

After Joao de Deus affair, the position was changed.

Now they talk about the "brazilian mediums fail", but the idolatry keeps the same.

They just avoid to say that Chico Xavier, per example, is a "demigod" or "illuminated angel".

They just say "Chico is good, humble, far from Jesus Christ's perfection and he only lived to help the poor and sad people".

The Chico Xavier's charity myth, which is so doubtful in results, despite the generalized claim that he "practiced charity in his entire life", remains unchanged.

The question is how purpose will be taken by the idea about "imperfect medims"?

How contribution can we bring to this idea?

The answer is, simply, none.

The "mediums who fail" don't help the Spiritism will be better understood in Brazil.

It doesn't help to adjust the real sense of Allan Kardec's original lessons.

It doesn't help to develop serious studies and researches about the spiritual life and the contacts between living and dead people.

The "imperfect mediums" myth only can keep the Spiritism deviations in Brazil as they always happened.

It will keep, mainly, the Catholic-made conceptions adopted by Brazilian Spiritist movement.

And it will keep the alleged psychographies that use the "dead of the moment's" name credited in a fake message to bring the same known religious mershandising: "let's reunite to the peace of Christ".

To admit fails does not necessarily fight the errors.

It can be an excuse to avoid the punishments.

Alleged brazilian mediums are recognized as "faulties" because they don't want to see their reputation to fall.

Commercial interests are involved in it. Chico Xavier's books, Divaldo Franco's books and talk expositions.

Despite the official intention to "give the money to the charity", it is a powerful industry that enriched the Brazilian Spiritism staff, including the "humble mediums".

There's no real result in benefit to the poor and the sick, precariously helped by the alleged mediums.

Low results prove that the alleged mediums really fail, mainly at charity.

But if they're faulty, there's no reason to admire them and take their quotes do publish in foolish and mamby-pamby memes on the social media.

The alleged mediums from Brazilian Spiritism are, in true, the worst shame to Allan Kardec's legacy.

Brazilian Spiritism: the religion of Post-Truth?

There's some pretense axioms of Brazilian Spiritism, diffused as undoubted truth:

"Spirits loss their individuality and personal talent after death, and go to develop the 'universal love language'".

"Brazilian mediuns are philosophers, philanthropists and progressist thinkers from the modern age".

"People must to suffer at extreme levels to conquer the definitive happiness".

"Victims are the main guilties of the crime and tragedy that affected them".

"Individuality is a form of selfism. An individual must to do what he didn't want, to reach enough evolution to catch the Heaven".

There's false ideas, but so much people think they're true, by emotional and moralistic burden they're carrying on.

Brazil became a fertile place for the mystification.

In Brazil, doctrinal deviations from original Allan Kardec's lessons, for Jean Baptiste Roustaing's ideas, got to be, unfortunately, so successful.

Brazil is not a well-developed nation, and we not mention it just for economical reasons.

A confused religiousness allowed the submissive acception to Roustaing's ideas adapted to brazilian reality by Francisco Candido Xavier.

Chico Xavier, as the alleged medium is popularly known, inserted the medieval-catholic concepts that Roustaing tried to develop in France.

Xavier was, throughtout his life, the enthusiast of Theology of Suffering, the most medieval chain from the Catholic Church.

And Theology of Suffering guides the Brazilian Spiritism content, most of Kardec's lessons.

For this reason, the original intelectual content was abandoned. Logic and common sense are replaced by blind faith - credited by Brazilian Spiritism as "reasoned faith" - and mystification.

Spiritual cities, since Nosso Lar (Our Home), were conceived without scientific basis.

Extreme sufferance, in a cruel conception, is considered an alleged trail to be near Heaven.

And everything preached by Brazilian Spiritism is considered "true and logical", despite being explicitally untrue and unfair.

No one have courage to questionate this conceptions, dominated by the "love bombing" appeals brought by Chico Xavier.

And it makes the Brazilian Spiritism a religion of Post-Truth.

Because its mystification is considered "logical and realistic", despite being so obscure and doubtful.

It's needy to break it, but everybody is afraid of getting rid of the "love bombing" appeals from Brazilian Spiritism.

Allan Kardec and Chico Xavier: Two antagonists

So much brazilians ingenuously believe that Francisco Candido Xavier, aka Chico Xavier, is an authentic disciple of Allan Kardec.

This is a big mistake.

They're opponents and there's a lot of confirmations about it.

Allan Kardec developed Spiritism based on his studies under the approach to Science and Philosophy principles.

Despite the persistent association to Kardec's legacy, Chico Xavier never shared the scientism instructions from the french teacher.

Observing with so much attemption the books of Chico Xavier, we can recognise ideas that not only go far from kardecian lessons, but are very opposite of them.

The brazilian alleged medium described the "spiritual city" of Nosso Lar (Our Home) without any kind of theoretical basis.

Kardec mentioned that human kind was unable to make a reasonable notion about the spiritual world, although the life after death is so probable.

Since Kardec's death, there's no research that got to recognise a possible notion what is really the spiritual world. And no work for some purpose was known currently.

Kardec's ideas was inspired in French's Age of Enlightenment. Chico Xavier, unlike, was always inspired to the Middle Age's Catholicism.

It's very sure and confirmed. Chico evocated the spirit of jesuit priest Manuel da Nobrega, a very known character of Brazil's colonial history.

The portuguese jesuit priest was immediately renamed Emmanuel, and became Chico's mentor.

But one aspect of Emmanuel was noted: he was very severely domineering.

Kardec consider the spirits of this conduct to lower levels of moral evolution.

So much things from all the legacy and testimony of Chico Xavier is reportedly opposite to the original Spiritism's ideas.

The one common aspect is the life after death's conception. But it's a package of different contents.

Kardecian books mentions life after death as a scientific and philosophic problem and invited the readers to study and discuss about it.

However, the books and testimonies of Xavier consider life after death as a finished idea, that should not need to be studied, but to be believed.

Unfortunately, read books is not a practice to be correctly and widely made by most of brazilians.

They usually read books hastily and choose works that are not very comitted to bring real knowledge and wisdom.

The most of brazilian readers prefer to read books that inspire an analgesic entertainment instead of instruction and knowledge.

If brazilian readers can read books seriously, will recognise the strong and irreconciliable differences between Allan Kardec's and Chico Xavier's books.

A huge abyss separates the respective works, one to other.

Sufferance: the evil side of Brazilian Spiritism

Brazilian Spiritism has a wonderful package.

It's a religion associated to alleged ideas as "simplicity", "humility", "intelligence", "futurism" and "charity".

But the content has nothing about that, despite the appearances and disguises around.

Brazilian Spiritism is very far from Allan Kardec's original teachings and became a repaginated version of Middle Age's Catholicism.

This confirmation scares a lot of people, but it's true and very realistic.

One of the aspects of the dark side of Brazilian Spiritism is the very conservative profile of Francisco Candido Xavier, aka Chico Xavier.

Most of his followers and supporters refuse this conservative profile - in the level next to Tea Party, for example - , based by the fanciful-sweetened image of Chico Xavier, always linked to pleasant things.

But he was very, very reactionary, sharing the same ideas from the Brazil's current president, Jair Bolsonaro, with the only exception to a declared apology to violence, refused by Xavier.

But the essential ideas astonishingly connect both Chico Xavier and Jair Bolsonaro.

The exhaustive work is one of them.

Chico Xavier always said: "Why you complain against exhaustive hours of work, when others have no second to have a job? When you're tired, keep working and go ahead".

The sufferance is the main principle that unites, reportedly, Chico Xavier and Jair Bolsonaro.

Heavy restrictions to pleasure and to attend the essential needs, renounce to precious projects to life, annihilation of the most fundamental desires.

There's so much principles of the moralism in Chico Xavier's ideas, which see incarnated life under a punitive approach.

Surely, it's not a kardecian-inherited principle, but the major principle of Theology of Suffering and a heritage from Jean-Baptiste Roustaing's ideas.

Chico Xavier reportedly adapted the ideas of Roustaing, published in The Four Gospels, to brazilian context.

The roustaingian ideas see the incarnated life as a criminal sentence. We only live to pay our alleged faults from other incarnations.

And the criminal payments are the principles of Chico Xavier's ideas.

"Suffer in silence", "Never complain", "Don't questionate", "Keep working though tired", "Hold the misfortunes in silence", "In extreme agony, don't you keen, but thank God for it".

Sufferance, submission, servitude, the sight of human life, according to Chico Xavier, is only to endure heavy difficulties, as a human would be in a hard champeonship.

It's not progressist, is a very conservative principle.

Obsessive fascination made (and still makes) people think Chico Xavier is a very progressist preacher.

People who think in this way are very mistaken, because Chico Xavier is very conservative, and he was it in very extreme levels than anybody can think, if would be inclined for that.

Chico Xavier's nephew should be killed by poison

Digital version of brazilian Manchete magazine brought us a great opportunity to know about a dark side about the life of Francisco Candido Xavier (aka Chico Xavier).

It's related to the misterious death of his nephew, Amauri Xavier Pena, ocurred in june 1961.

He was an alcohol addicted, but he was lucid when he dediced to denunciate his uncle about the frauds from mediunity.

Amauri was announced as Chico Xavier's successor, and the young man affirmed that he was forced to pretend the paranormality, making people believe that he also received messages from great late writers from the spiritual life.

Amauri was troubled about that and he decided to denunciate Chico Xavier and other involved into the brazilian spiritist movement.

The curious thing we see in this case is that the Brazilian Spiritism, officially refused to make hate and offending practices, actually made it against Amauri Xavier.

So much lies were announced against Amauri Xavier, allegedly described by an agressive police officer, captain Agostinho Couto (with the behaviour which seems so similar than the current Jair Bolsonaro's supporters), as a "house robber" and "false money manufacturer".

An agressive defamation campaign against Amauri was made by spiritists that usually claim unable to hate or offend anyone, even a murderer.

People alleged to be "unable to fight an only insect" made a "reputation kill" to Amauri Xavier.

Morally devastated, Amauri was sent to a spiritist sanatory in Sabara, a city at Belo Horizonte's county, and he spent some time there. It's suspected that he suffered agressions there, deserving investigations about it.

Amauri died after released from sanatory, officially by hepatitis, maybe toxic hepatitis.

He died too much young than a simple alcohol addicted should usually die. This addicted usually dies being, at least, 35 years-old, and Amauri died when he was 27.

The Manchete report revealed that Amauri received death threats inside the Brazilian Spiritist Movement.

In Belo Horizonte, Sabará and Pedro Leopoldo (Chico Xavier's birth town), it was said that Amauri was threatened to die by poison, by the spiritist staff, and that he decided "unmask his uncle for resentment", said the text, signed by brazilian journalist Jayme Negreiros.

Officially, Brazilian Spiritist Federation (FEB) mourned Amauri's death and said that he just died by hepatitis.

But the case is a dark side inside the Brazilian Spiritism Movement.

It has relations to Chico Xavier's idolatry, that makes fanaticism to his followers and supporters.

This fanaticism goes to hate reactions, when something goes wrong against Chico Xavier.

That's the pure myth of "high level energies" doesn't work in reality.

When counteracted, Chico Xavier's followers and supporters can hate, offend and, in extreme cases, kill someone.

That's the bitter lesson of the Amauri Xavier's tragedy.

Brazilian Spiritism's moralism and the question of "me"

The moralism of Brazilian Spiritism is very strange and so far to French Spiritism.

It consists to see the incarnation as a criminal condemnation and people only live to pay severe moral debts.

The preachers fall in contradiction, which is the Brazilian Spiritism's speciality.

They say, in one moment, that people must to accept the sufferance in silence and waiting for the God's help.

In other moment, they deny they said and appeal to a very known cliché: "Nobody was born to suffer, we was born to be happy".

Ok, ok, ok. But the contradictions are very strong.

The preachers usually say: "Treat the misfortune like a loved pal", "What are several decades of disasters before the infinitive time of blessings?".

Some of those preachers can talk about the "enemy of yourself".

There's a language problem. Some Brazilian Spiritism preacher would say something like this:

"It's necessary to abandon the 'me', to left behind the individual needs and to focus to subordinate to the God's purposes".

It's very easy to say it, whereas the "me" is not the preacher on his own.

It's very comfortable, because the "me" is always the other. The preacher dissimulates the personal convictions, he claims himself as a God's spokesperson.

But it's very cruel, because is very easy and convenient to a preacher to say to other people accept the extreme sufferance.

If the suffer can be an appropriate job, if the suffer can't find a girlfriend with compatible personality, if the suffer is humiliated and threatened at the social media, the Brazilian Spiritism's preacher doesn't care about it.

The preacher just smiles and say to the suffer: "You're going in the right way, stay calm and pray to God".

It seems so wonderful and fraternal, but it's cruel. Brazilian Spiritism doesn't feel the sufferance that its clients have to endure.

It's insensitive, cruel and puts the preachers in a condition compared to the corrupt police officers, who don't care about the stolen victim of a robbery.

This situation shuts down the myth of the Brazilian Spiritism as a religion that gives many help to anyone.

Inspired to Theory of Sufferance (medieval Catholic chain), Brazilian Spiritism never know about the sufferance of the unlucky.

But the preachers have good life, they make books or seminaries, have hugs to important people, and travel by great airlines companies and hosts in excelent hotels.

Brazilian Spiritism only emulates the humble tour of Jesus Christ to bring his sacred word to people, or the self-payed research travels of Allan Kardec.

But nothing of these are real and the alleged mediums have stewardships that Jesus and Kardec never interested to get.

That's bad. And that's why Brazilian Spiritism preachers must to ask the suffers to be patient at their unstoppable agony.

The Brazilian Spiritism preachers simply don't know what is really the sufferance.